Safety First
Consider potential harm before recording and publication. Participants may stop the conversation, exclude a passage, or choose anonymity.
Methodology · Do No Harm
An ethical decision considers participant dignity, cultural context, potential harm, and a community's right to be heard.
At a glance
Formal consent is not enough when publication creates foreseeable risk. Sensitive material requires additional review and a clear feedback route.
This is an editorial guide for the initiative’s development version. It explains an approach and does not replace professional medical, legal or financial advice.
Practical route
Begin with context, record decisions and preserve each person’s right to revisit the terms.
Consider potential harm before recording and publication. Participants may stop the conversation, exclude a passage, or choose anonymity.
Do not exoticise traditions or rank cultures by an external scale. Present regional differences and participant perspectives without generalising about groups.
Refer sensitive material to a country expert and ethics committee. Prioritise community concerns and document the decisions made.
Working checklist
Both photographs on this page are unique object-based AI illustrations. They do not depict real people, traditions or places.
FAQ
Tell us how you could contribute. Material is published only after rights, sources and consent have been reviewed.